Where are the hunters for sensible gun laws?
Bob Barker, the retired game-show host, has no idea why he ended up on the National Rifle Association’s enemies list. I know exactly why the NRA cited me.
I’ve spent years pushing for sensible gun-safety laws, including universal background checks, a ban on assault-type weapons and a waiting period before firearms purchases. I wasn’t surprised to learn that my name was among those on a surprisingly long and eclectic list of corporations, Hollywood celebrities, medical groups and even sports teams that the NRA has declared “anti-gun.”
By contrast, the 89-year-old Barker keeps a handgun on his bedside table and has never demanded more stringent gun laws, he told Time. He has, however, protested a live pigeon-shoot in Pennsylvania and doesn’t think civilians need assault weapons or high-capacity magazines.
Of course, if you know anything about the NRA, you know that’s enough. Its extremism is dangerous, absurd and viciously dogmatic — dismissing anyone who doesn’t think civilians should own their own shoulder-fired rocket-launchers as an “enemy.” It is a radical organization of paranoid conspiracy theorists who believe they might have to fight off their government with assault rifles. Think of that goofy 1984 movie, “Red Dawn,” wherein a group of high school kids fight off a Soviet invasion, and you’ll get some idea of its mindset.
It’s easy enough to mock the NRA; it representatives are parodies in motion. But a look across the political and civic landscape suggests that some of the gun lobby’s extremism has invaded the broader culture, creating a deeply polarized view of firearms use that relies on stock stereotypes, not reality.
Take the silly kerfuffle that followed President Obama’s recent disclosure that he enjoys skeet-shooting at Camp David. While it struck me as revealing of next-to-nothing, it set off rounds of debate, derision and ridicule on the political left as well as the right. The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart blasted Obama for pandering to gun-owners, saying, “It’s not going to work.”
The Washington Post’s vaunted fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, even weighed in with this opinionated and oddly non-salient observation about Obama’s first campaign: “He certainly did not speak like a politician who had once used a firearm.” What kind of speaking would that have been?
Allow me to disclose that I have never shot skeet. I have, however, shot squirrels. Growing up in a small town in Alabama with a dad who loved hunting, I occasionally accompanied him into the woods. I don’t disclose that to appease gun owners but rather to remind you that advocacy for sensible gun laws is no indication of a visceral anti-gun mindset.
When did the nation forget that? How did we come to separate ourselves into pro- and anti-gun? If we set strict requirements for the operation of automobiles, does that make our state governments anti-car?
It is quite possible to own firearms, to enjoy hunting and to brag about bagging an eleven-point buck while still endorsing stricter gun control measures. My father was stringent about safety, only hunting with others who were similarly cautious. A combat veteran, he also knew the dangers of arming people who had little practice using firearms under pressure.
It turns out, moreover, that there are many gun owners who don’t fall into the false pro/anti-gun categories. According to the Pew Center, half of those with a gun in the household believe that allowing citizens to own assault weapons makes the country more dangerous. So there are plenty of gun-owners in America who would support sensible gun control measures.
Their voices, however, are missing from this vital debate. The NRA certainly doesn’t represent them. LaPierre insists that any reasonable form of gun control will open the gates to government confiscation of all firearms and re-education camps for red-blooded, freedom-loving Americans. Really. That’s what he wants his members to believe.
Reasonable gun owners should form their own group: Hunters for Gun Control or Target Shooters Against Assault Weapons or Bob Barker’s Anti-Absolutist Brigade. They need to take back the public square from the gun nuts who give them a bad name.
Banning any weapon is not an example of “reasonable gun laws”. We need criminal control, not gun control. With freedom comes certain risks in a free society. This applies to the issue of guns as well. We run the risk that some people will misuse that freedom. We as a society should then punish those people to the fullest extent possible. Not make excuses that attribute their criminal acts to their bad childhoods, their drug problem, etc as is currently in vogue.
You get to write as you do because of the First Amendment. You continue to have that ability due to the Second Amendment, and yet liberals like you seem to be quick to trash any freedoms that you don’t agree with personally. I find that disturbing.
Gun control had its start in racism, with efforts to keep the Black population disarmed and vulnerable. I find it disturbing that you want to make general society as a whole more vulnerable by denying them the ability to defend themselves with the firearms of their choice. The liberals will not reach some magic point in gun rules and stop pushing for more gun laws. The liberals don’t want guns in general society, period. Taking all guns away would not make people safer. Currently firearms save their owners 2 million times a year. That is an additional 2 million people who would be victims if they don’t have their guns.
OK Any ideas on how to go about forming a group gun owners for gun control.I believe that there are enough of us that fall into that category to be able to counter the power of the NRA but we must come together somehow in order that our voices will be heard. The NRA has tons of money but to start a grassroots movement with 0$ would be difficult.
Robert, I suggest that you contact a few acquaintances with similar views and set up a Web site. I think responsible gun owners would flock to your group.
Hello! I just would like to give an enormous thumbs up for the superb info you have here on this post. I will likely be coming back to your blog for much more soon.
Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a marvellous job! dkgckdkfgfba
I think this is among the most important info for
me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is great, the articles
is really great : D. Good job, cheers
Comments are closed.